Judicial Confirmation Blog

Welcome to the RNLA's new Blog on the Judicial Confirmation Crisis. We trust that all users will conduct their activities here with the highest degree of professionalism and sensitivity. As a free exchange, both this area and the information contained in it are neither endorsed nor officially sanctioned by RNLA.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

ABA Rating for 5th Circuit Nominee Angers Specter

Too often when the ABA plays liberal politics with nominees, Republicans rightly allege that the rating is evidence of the ABA's bias and that is the end of it. (Interestingly, when the ABA rates a Republican nominee well, the Democrats try to ignore the rating.) However, never before has a Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman made the ABA itself the issue. But that is just what moderate Republican Senator Arlen Specter is attempting to do. As seen elsewhere in this blog and on the web, the rating of Michael Wallace is not about his record as a lawyer but rather about his time on the Legal Services Corporation during which his positions were vehemently opposed by current ABA President Greco and Chair of the ABA Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary Tober.

Let's hope Senator Specter is successful in not only having the ABA re-rate Wallace but also forcing the ABA to change their procedures. Please read and sign the letter above for one idea and a small way all lawyers interested in fairness can help.

If the ABA continues to put personal liberal vendettas above the law, then they should be removed from any formal role in the confirmation process.

# posted by Michael Thielen @ 9:30 AM

Comments:

Wallace's situation has been much chronicled, however Judge Terrence Boyle a nominee to the 4th Circuit COA may also take the cake.

While on the Senate floor awaiting for a fair "up or down" vote, the liberal ABA decided to drop Boyle's unanimously well-qualified rating to a majority qualified rating with a minority well-qualified.

Boyle is a judge who has served with honor and distinction for over 22 years, while writing multiple opinions for the court he was nominated to and serving as Chief Judge of the eastern district of North Carolina for seven years, yet without any explanation, at a crucial time, the ABA attempts to hijack a nomination that has encountered every delay tactic you could think of.

Wallace's situation nothwithstanding, Specter should investigate the timing and motive behind Judge Boyle's downgrade, too.

# posted by

Anonymous : 8:23 PM

Archives

Links

Thursday, August 24, 2006

ABA Rating for 5th Circuit Nominee Angers Specter


Archives February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 Links Bench Memos confirmthem Committee for Justice Hugh Hewitt U.S. Courts Evergreen Freedom Foundation

	Welcome to the RNLA's new Blog on the Judicial Confirmation Crisis. We trust that all users will conduct their activities here with the highest degree of professionalism and sensitivity. As a free exchange, both this area and the information contained in it are neither endorsed nor officially sanctioned by RNLA. Thursday, August 24, 2006 ABA Rating for 5th Circuit Nominee Angers Specter Too often when the ABA plays liberal politics with nominees, Republicans rightly allege that the rating is evidence of the ABA's bias and that is the end of it. (Interestingly, when the ABA rates a Republican nominee well, the Democrats try to ignore the rating.) However, never before has a Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman made the ABA itself the issue. But that is just what moderate Republican Senator Arlen Specter is attempting to do. As seen elsewhere in this blog and on the web, the rating of Michael Wallace is not about his record as a lawyer but rather about his time on the Legal Services Corporation during which his positions were vehemently opposed by current ABA President Greco and Chair of the ABA Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary Tober. Let's hope Senator Specter is successful in not only having the ABA re-rate Wallace but also forcing the ABA to change their procedures. Please read and sign the letter above for one idea and a small way all lawyers interested in fairness can help. If the ABA continues to put personal liberal vendettas above the law, then they should be removed from any formal role in the confirmation process. # posted by Michael Thielen @ 9:30 AM Comments: Wallace's situation has been much chronicled, however Judge Terrence Boyle a nominee to the 4th Circuit COA may also take the cake. While on the Senate floor awaiting for a fair "up or down" vote, the liberal ABA decided to drop Boyle's unanimously well-qualified rating to a majority qualified rating with a minority well-qualified. Boyle is a judge who has served with honor and distinction for over 22 years, while writing multiple opinions for the court he was nominated to and serving as Chief Judge of the eastern district of North Carolina for seven years, yet without any explanation, at a crucial time, the ABA attempts to hijack a nomination that has encountered every delay tactic you could think of. Wallace's situation nothwithstanding, Specter should investigate the timing and motive behind Judge Boyle's downgrade, too. # posted by Anonymous : 8:23 PM Post a Comment Links to this post: <$BlogBacklinkTitle$> <$BlogBacklinkSnippet$> posted by <$BlogBacklinkAuthor$> @ <$BlogBacklinkDateTime$> Create a Link << Home