Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Judges and the New Senate
This article from the New York Observer demonstrates why the failure to use the Judge issue was so devastating. Allen in Virginia did not use it. Was it worth 8000 votes? Probably. Burns used it late and unconvincingly. Was it worth 3000 votes in Montana? Even in Missouri, if the GOP had been highlighting this issue for months, could it not have pulled the marvelous Jim Talent over the line?
Now one of the men most hostile to the rule of law, and most viciously partisan of any Senator, Chuck Schumer will do all he can to smear and degrade good nominees. Patrick Leahy does not have Schumer's intelligence or off putting manner but he shares the low cunning and sure knowledge that his schemes to disenfranchise social conservatives through court decisions can now be advanced should another court vacancy emerge.
We must be prepared for either weak nominees from the President, or party line votes in the Senate Judiciary committee. That will mean the Presidents Supreme Court nominees go to the floor with a "no" recommendation. I dont' beleve the Democrats can afford to filibuster a good Supreme Court nominee but they can press to vote him or her down. Appellate Judges are now doomed. No known constitutionalist judge will now get through the Senate to the appellate bench for two years.
The Republicans have 49 votes. They must leverage them to maximum advantage or Schumer's boasting will be prophetic. The President and the Senate REpublicans must work hand in glove in order to fight for the next nominee. It is not going to be easy.
Now one of the men most hostile to the rule of law, and most viciously partisan of any Senator, Chuck Schumer will do all he can to smear and degrade good nominees. Patrick Leahy does not have Schumer's intelligence or off putting manner but he shares the low cunning and sure knowledge that his schemes to disenfranchise social conservatives through court decisions can now be advanced should another court vacancy emerge.
We must be prepared for either weak nominees from the President, or party line votes in the Senate Judiciary committee. That will mean the Presidents Supreme Court nominees go to the floor with a "no" recommendation. I dont' beleve the Democrats can afford to filibuster a good Supreme Court nominee but they can press to vote him or her down. Appellate Judges are now doomed. No known constitutionalist judge will now get through the Senate to the appellate bench for two years.
The Republicans have 49 votes. They must leverage them to maximum advantage or Schumer's boasting will be prophetic. The President and the Senate REpublicans must work hand in glove in order to fight for the next nominee. It is not going to be easy.
Comments:
Links to this post:
<< Home
In the article Fremont links to Chuck Schumer is quoted saying "If we can keep our focus on the average family, we will stay a majority for a generation." Wise words perhaps, but if Senate Democrats continue their pattern of blocking multiple conservative justices to the courts, they will certainly NOT appeal to the average family. Americans have had their fill of activist judges. We must press upon Republican Senators the importance of fighting for these nominees. Doing so will likely be the biggest factor to regaining a Republican majority in 2008.
Interestingly, pre-election polls *(at least per the pundits on the two different pre-election panels I attended) did not register judges as an election issue. That means the Republicans have a lot of heavy lifting to do in 2008 to make it an election issue. Presumably, the Democrats will give us some fodder over the next 18 months, but this election shows nothing can be taken for granted.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
<< Home






