Find A Lawyer Republican National Lawyers Association
About RNLA
Find A Lawyer
Practice Areas
Local Contacts
Newsletter
Events and Education
Membership Application
Donate
Become a Sponsor
Photo Gallery
Press
Leadership
Leadership
Home
Members Only
Find A Lawyer RNLA Logo

Mr. Arthur B. Mark III
Trainor Fairbrook
Regular Member
Office:
980 Fulton Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825

Phone: 916 929 7000
Email: amark@trainorfairbrook.com
Web Site: trainorfairbrook.com

Law School: Creighton University School of Law (2002)

Practice Areas:

 

I practice commercial real estate litigation with Trainor Fairbrook in Sacramento, California. I holds a BA in Economics, summa cum laude from Austin College. I graduated magna cum laude from Creighton University School of Law, in 2002, where among other accomplishments I served as Student Articles Editor for the Creighton Law Review.

Prior to joining Trainor Fairbrook in 2006, I practiced constitutional law for four years with the Pacific Legal Foundation, a national non-profit public interest law organization headquartered in Sacramento, California. My work with the Pacific Legal Foundation included constitutional litigation, with a focus on individual rights and limits on the federal government’s power. Among the cases I litigated at PLF was Smith v. Novato Unified School District, (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1439 in which I served as trial counsel and authored the principal brief on appeal. The Smith case set new precedent for high school students’ free speech rights under the California Constitution.

I have continued to refine my appellate skills at Trainor Fairbrook. Among the cases I have handled recently, two stand-out for setting precedent: Sixells, LLC v. Cannery Business Park, et. al., (2008) 170 Cal.App.4th 648, and
Muzzi v. Bel Air Mart, (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 456.

My published works to date include Currents In Commerce Clause Scholarship Since Lopez: A Survey, 32 Capital University Law Review 671 (2004) and United States v. Morrison, The Commerce Clause and the Substantial Effect Test, No Substantial Limit on Federal Power, 34 Creighton University Law Review 675 (2001). Both works discuss the proper scope of federal authority under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

When not practicing law, I enjoy reading (books as opposed to case law), and running and cycling, and spending time with my family.

RNLA Logo


Disclaimer: Content contained or made available through this web site is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed, nor is anything submitted to any party through this web site treated as confidential. The accuracy, completeness and adequacy of information on this web site is not warranted or guaranteed. Biographic information on this web site is provided by the listees, and the RNLA does not review or confirm its accuracy. Determination of a need for legal services and selection of a lawyer should never be based only on review of biographic materials. The listing of "practice areas" by members on this web site does not mean either that the member is an expert in that area, or that any organization has certified the member as being a specialist or competent in that area. No representation is made that the quality of legal services performed by members is greater than the quality of other lawyers. Neither RNLA nor its officers or employees assume any liability, whether arising from contract, negligence, or otherwise.

RNLA Home RNLA Home