There are many reasons to support Sen. Jeff Sessions as the next Attorney General of the United States, yet Democrats and liberals have baselessly attacked him, smearing his character and dismissing his years of public service through false, partisan attacks.  Read more about Sen. Sessions' record from RNLA's President Elliot Berke here.

Here are the real reasons for all the charges of racism, irrelevant liberal talking points, and grandstanding during Sen. Jeff Sessions' confirmation hearings last week:

Last week, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it was designating election systems as "critical infrastructure," thereby bringing elections under the purview of DHS.  EAC Commissioner Christy McCormick raised serious questions and concerns about this extension of federal power over elections:

During Senator Jeff Sessions' confirmation hearings yesterday, and indeed throughout the last month, William Smith, former Chief Counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee, ably and eloquently supported Sen. Sessions' nomination for attorney general.  Mr. Smith speaks from his vast personal and professional knowledge of Sen. Sessions, defending him from attacks on both his character and record: 

Senator Sessions said in his opening statement in his hearing to be Attorney General yesterday:

Today, the RNLA sent a letter urging the Senate to quickly confirm Sen. Sessions as the next Attorney General of the United States:

RNLA's Founding Chair Bob Horn writes a strong endorsement of Sen. Jeff Sessions for Attorney General:

Liberals, particularly the NAACP, in the past few weeks have repeated the claim that Sen. Jeff Sessions is a racist based on his 1985 prosecution of civil rights activists for absentee ballot vote fraud.  

Newly anointed Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer insists that therules of the confirmation process are different for President-elect Trump's nominees than they were for President Obama's nominees:

Allegations of vote fraud have run rampant in the 2016 gubernatorial election in North Carolina. One of the strongest may be that the lack of voter ID may have let out-of-state students vote in North Carolina.