On Monday, the Committee on House Administration's Election Subcommittee held a hearing in Florida on “Voting Rights and Election Administration.”

Democrats intentionally stacked the panel full of liberal congressional members and witnesses in order to outnumber Republican representation and stifle our perspective from being heard.

While Congressman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) was the only Republican member and Logan Churchwell (Public Interest Legal Foundation) served as the only Republican witness, they stood their ground and spoke the truth.

There are several take-aways from this week’s hearing with Attorney General Bill Barr before the Senate Judiciary Committee. We now know that Democrats will stop at nothing to lie, deflect, and accuse innocent people in order to try to hurt President Trump.

There was one consistent theme throughout the testimony of Attorney General Bill Barr yesterday – Democrats failed to get any of their attacks to stick and only accomplished embarrassing themselves at every accusatory question.

Today, Attorney General William Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the report by special counsel Robert Mueller.

He re-affirmed what we already know to be true: President Trump did not collude with the Russian government.

As expected, Democrats’ theatrics were put on full display throughout the hearing as they attacked AG Barr and accused him of petty mishandling of the report.

RNLA Vice President of Communications, Harmeet Dhillon, recently published an article in the Wall Street Journal where she exposes the hypocrisy of leading Democratic Presidential candidate, Senator Kamala Harris, when it comes to felons’s voting rights.

Senator Harris’s positions as a former prosecutor are out of step with her party’s increasingly radical ideas about criminal justice, thus she has resigned to flip-flopping in order to pander to the far left.

On April 5, the Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA) held its 19th annual National Policy Conference in Washington, D.C. This event was widely attended by members and attorneys from across the country to hear from policy and legal experts. The morning sessions were broadcasted live on C-SPAN.

One of the most popular sessions was a discussion by former Independent Counsel, Judge Kenneth Starr. He spoke about his recently released book, Contempt: A Memoir of the Clinton Investigation which recounts the investigation he led some twenty years prior and how its impact continues to ripple through today.

Judge Starr’s timely speech to attendees offered the lens of his experience as Independent Counsel in a current political world consumed by the investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his investigation.

Joe Biden's announcement that he is running for President was unique in that the prelude included several apologies or near apologies for his behavior toward women.  Among those apologies was one to Anita Hill, who falsely accused Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment.  As former Associate White House Counsel Mark Paoletta wrote a few years back when the Hill-Thomas subject was being brought up in relation to the Bill Cosby and Roger Ailes matters:

Democrats have taken to a nationwide inquisition questioning the election laws and voting processes of Republican-leaning states that Trump won in 2016. Under the guise of topics like “voting rights”, the House Subcommittee on Elections has been conducting field hearings from North Dakota and Ohio to Texas and Georgia.

The Mueller Report tells the country in granular detail the ground covered by Special Counsel Robert Mueller while investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election. 

This morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Department of Commerce v. New York concerning whether the plan to include a question on citizenship on the 2020 census violated either the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) or the Constitution's enumeration clause.  Solicitor General Noel Francisco represented the United States in defense of adding the question, and three advocates argued on behalf of Democrat-controlled states, liberal organizations, and the U.S. House against including the question.